# Metruvo portfolio analysis Muse connector

From musedirectory.ai, the independent directory of Meta Muse connectors. Not affiliated with Meta.

## Metruvo portfolio analysis

Compare ETFs, analyze portfolio overlap, charges and regional or sector exposure from published fund data.

- Record: https://musedirectory.ai/connector/metruvo-portfolio-analysis
- Category: Finance & Bills
- Developer: Metruvo (https://metruvo.com/mcp)
- Muse status: Extra setup. Not in Muse's Connectors list yet. Muse can still use it: its page gives you a request to paste into Muse.
- Health: Working, 474ms, checked 2026-10-30T01:51:13Z
- Endpoint: https://metruvo.com/api/mcp
- Auth: No account needed; Pricing: unknown
- Screening: Screened, no issues found (2026-10-30T01:51:13Z)
- Source: Found in the official MCP Registry (com.metruvo/fund-comparison) https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers?search=com.metruvo%2Ffund-comparison

Read-only portfolio analysis tool that searches published ETF data by name, ISIN or ticker. Compare two funds side by side, analyze overlap and concentration in a multi-holding portfolio, and rank funds by ongoing charges, regional exposure, overlap and holdings count.

Example request: "Show me how much my two ETFs overlap and what their annual charges are."

How to connect: Not in Muse's Connectors list yet, but Muse can still use it. Paste this into Muse: "Use Metruvo portfolio analysis to help me. It is a free service with an MCP server at https://metruvo.com/api/mcp. It does not need an API key. Ask me before you share anything with it." Muse asks before it shares anything with the app's site. Meta does not review apps used this way, so only use ones you trust. We tested this in the Muse app on September 24, 2026: Muse used an app's link directly this way and returned a live answer.

Tools:
- search_funds: Search the published instrument catalogue by name, ISIN or ticker; includes currency and listing identifiers. Returns checkUrl: a shareable link to the same result.
- xray_portfolio: Illustrate free-preview ETF overlap/concentration findings, known ongoing charges and regional/sector exposures from published evidence. Identify each holding with exactly one ISIN or ticker; a ticker can be ambiguous across exchanges. Use positive relative weights, values in one
- compare_funds: Illustrate two ETFs as a 50/50 portfolio, with overlap and issuer facts including dated ongoing charges side by side, and each fund's own region and sector exposure. Identify each side with exactly one ISIN or ticker; a ticker can be ambiguous across exchanges. Unknown facts rema
- rank_funds: Sort 2 to 10 funds by up to three published facts: ongoing charge, US share, pairwise overlap and holdings count. Rows follow the criteria in order. A missing fact sorts last and stays null; it is never estimated. Rates are decimal fractions (0.07 = 7%). Educational comparison on

Screening checks:
- MCP handshake: pass (Answered in 474ms)
- Domain against threat feeds (Cloudflare security DNS): pass (metruvo.com not flagged)
- Published packages against the OSV malicious-package database: n/a (No npm or PyPI package published)
- Hidden instructions or invisible characters in tool text: pass (4 tools read, nothing found)
- Inputs asking for passwords, card numbers or seed phrases: pass (None found)
- Domain and redirects: pass (Domain registered 42 days ago)
- AI review of purpose and tool behavior: pass (No concerns)